Enter a URL
A broken link points visitors toward a resource that cannot be reached as expected. The destination may have been deleted, moved, renamed, restricted or temporarily unavailable. Broken Links Finder helps you inspect links associated with one submitted webpage and separates the results into internal and external links for easier review.
Use the report as a starting point for maintenance, not as an automatic verdict. A failed request can indicate a genuinely missing page, but it can also result from a temporary server problem, access restriction, rate limit, timeout or automated-request protection. Confirm important findings manually before removing a link or changing a redirect.
Enter a complete webpage URL and submit the form. The tool validates the address and passes it to its link-checking function. It analyses the submitted page's links and returns internal and external result groups. An internal link generally points within the same website, while an external link points to another website or host.
The controller accepts one URL for each check. It does not contain a scheduled monitoring system, bulk export function or complete multi-page crawler. Testing a homepage does not guarantee that every link on every page of the website has been examined. Check other important pages separately when conducting a broader review.
Start with pages that receive traffic or support important user journeys, such as the homepage, navigation pages, product or service pages, help articles and contact pages. Check the exact canonical URL that visitors use because redirected or alternate versions can contain different markup.
Internal links connect pages or resources within the same website. They help visitors navigate, discover related information and complete tasks. They also help crawlers discover site content. When an internal destination changes, update the source link and consider whether the old URL needs an appropriate redirect.
External links lead to another website or host. You cannot directly repair someone else's page, but you can replace the destination with a reliable source, link to a current equivalent, remove the reference or retain it with suitable context. External sites can block automated checks even when the destination opens normally for a person.
A 404 response normally means the server was reached but the requested resource was not found. If the resource has a clear replacement, update the link or create a relevant redirect. Do not redirect every missing URL to the homepage because an unrelated destination can confuse users and search engines.
A 410 response communicates that a resource was intentionally removed and is expected to remain unavailable. Replace or remove links pointing to it unless the unavailable status itself is useful context.
A 403 response means the server understood the request but refused access. The page may require permission or may block automated tools. A reported 403 is not automatically a dead link; try the destination in a normal browser and consider whether ordinary visitors can access it.
A 401 response indicates that authentication is required. A link to a private account or administrative area may be intentional, but public-page visitors should be told that sign-in is required.
Responses in the 500 range usually indicate a server-side failure. The problem may be temporary, so retest before editing the source page. For a destination you control, review application logs, hosting health and recent deployments.
Redirects can be valid, especially after a migration. Long chains, loops and redirects to unrelated pages can still create a poor experience. Update internal links to the final preferred URL when practical, while preserving necessary redirects for old references.
Automated link checkers do not always receive the same response as a human browser. A destination may block the checker's user agent, limit repeated requests, require JavaScript, depend on session cookies or challenge visitors with a CAPTCHA. Some servers reject one request method while allowing another. Network and DNS failures can also be temporary.
For these reasons, verify a suspicious result manually. Open the destination in a private browser window, check whether login is expected, and repeat the test later if the server appears unstable. Do not remove a legitimate reference solely because one automated request failed.
The tool works from the submitted page and the content it can retrieve. Links generated only after JavaScript executes, revealed after interaction, stored in a private area or embedded inside an inaccessible document may not be available to the checker. A destination might also return a successful status while displaying a custom error message, expired notice or unrelated content.
This situation is sometimes called a soft error. Status alone cannot confirm that the destination still satisfies the link's purpose. Manually review important links for relevance, content and user experience in addition to technical accessibility.
If the destination exists and the source link contains a typo, edit the link to use the correct preferred URL. Check character case, trailing path, scheme and copied punctuation. Test the published page rather than relying only on an editor preview.
Restore a deleted page or file when it remains useful and its original URL should continue serving visitors. Confirm that restored content is accurate, current and properly linked within the site.
When content permanently moves, redirect the old URL to the closest equivalent destination. Use permanent redirects for genuine long-term moves. Avoid chains by linking directly to the final preferred URL from pages you control.
If no useful replacement exists and the reference no longer helps visitors, remove the link and adjust the surrounding sentence. Do not leave misleading anchor text that implies unavailable supporting information.
First confirm that the external failure is persistent and not an access block. Search the publisher's current website for the same resource, but make sure any replacement supports the original statement. An archived copy may help research, although it should not be treated as current guidance when the subject changes over time.
If no reliable alternative exists, remove or rewrite the reference. Keep editorial context accurate and avoid automatically substituting an unrelated high-authority page. The value of an external link comes from helping the reader, not from the destination's popularity alone.
Maintaining links supports navigation and helps users reach intended resources. Broken internal links can waste crawl attempts and make important pages harder to discover. However, one broken link does not automatically cause a fixed ranking penalty, and repairing links does not guarantee higher positions or traffic.
Google generally treats missing pages through their HTTP status and discovered links. Use accurate status codes, helpful navigation, appropriate redirects and updated internal links. Focus on resolving issues that affect real users and essential content rather than chasing a perfect score generated by one checker.
No. The controller processes one submitted URL and returns its internal and external link results. Test additional pages separately for wider coverage.
No. The destination may block automated requests or require permission. Verify whether an ordinary intended visitor can open it.
No. Redirect only when a relevant replacement exists. Otherwise a proper not-found or gone response may be clearer.
No. It provides results for review. Corrections must be made in the website editor, template, code, server configuration or destination management system.
No. It can improve navigation and maintenance, but search performance depends on many technical, content and competitive factors.
Server availability, redirects, rate limits, DNS, access policies and temporary network conditions can change. Confirm persistent problems through repeated and manual testing.
Broken Links Finder offers a focused way to review internal and external links associated with one webpage. Investigate each reported failure, understand the destination's purpose and apply the most relevant correction. Combined with careful manual checks, the report can help keep navigation accurate without pretending to provide complete site crawling, continuous monitoring or guaranteed SEO results.
